News on U.S. government agencies, U.S. politics, companies doing business with U.S. federal government. Read U.S. national and local news. This site is not affiliated with United States Government.
(EMAILWIRE.COM, March 29, 2012 ) LegalView.com, a leading online legal resource, has reported on another story of vaginal mesh complications.
For Jay Nevarez, a mother-of-three in Colorado, undergoing surgery to treat her stress urinary incontinence became one of the worst experiences in her life. As part of her treatment, a transvaginal mesh was surgically implanted, however vaginal mesh has been linked to several serious complications, including severe pain and infection.
Nevarez claims she had no idea it was very similar to a mesh device that was recalled nearly a decade ago due to several complications.
During a press conference, Nevarez stood next to Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) in a walker, and told reporters about quitting her job due to the constant pain. Her house is also facing foreclosure.
Nevarez has filed suit against Johnson & Johnson, the maker of the device she received, alleging she was harmed by the device. The device she had implanted, called Gynecare TVT mesh implant, went through automatic pre-market approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration based on its similarity to another product made by Boston Scientific even though it had been recalled shortly after Gynecare TVT was approved.
According to Markey, several other devices were approved well after the original Boston Scientific device was removed from the market, which is extremely troubling.
In a statement aimed at garnering support for legislation that would help to strengthen FDA regulation on medical devices, Markey said that the current law has a loophole that requires the FDA to approve certain kinds of medical devices based on previous similarities even if the agency feels they may harm others. As long as manufacturers can prove that their device is “substantially similar” to others on the market, it can be approved for human use.
The bill, called the Safety of Untested and New Devices (SOUND) Act, would allow the FDA to require manufacturers of devices based on older devices to provide documentation showing that the new product's design has fixed potential problems. Markey hopes the bill will be added to a larger medical device bill that Congress is set to vote on in May.
So far, neither the Senate nor the House bill that contains wording to close the loophole and the SOUND Act has gained any Republican sponsors.
A spokesperson for Boston Scientific says that they believe in the strength of the FDA's current medical device approval process. Johnson & Johnson did not respond to any requests.
Even though the FDA hasn't lent any official support for the bill, spokesperson Karen Riley did comment that the agency has raised issues about the loophole to Congress in the past and that the bill would bolster the medical device process and “provide appropriate protections for public health.”
If you or someone you love has suffered from the adverse effects of a vaginal mesh implant, please visit LegalView, http://www.legalview.com, to receive a free legal consultation with a medical device attorney.
About LegalView:
LegalView is a public service brought to you by Legal WebTV Network, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation created by a group of the nation's most highly respected law firms: Anapol Schwartz; Cohen, Placitella and Roth; James F. Humphreys and Associates; and Lopez McHugh. For more information on the accomplishments and track records of LegalView's superior sponsoring law firms and to get in touch with LegalView attorneys, visit LegalView at www.Legalview.com.
We are pleased to offer you this exciting, new, and entirely free professional resource. Visit our Free Industry resource center today to browse our selection of 600+ complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more. Get popular titles including:
